Comments on: Freelander 2 gets top safety rating

By: Burlahee O'Hurlahee

Burlahee O'Hurlahee — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:24:47 +0000

Not all 4×4 have bull bars, ya bully boy nonsense talker.

By: Prappy Campbell

Prappy Campbell — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:34:48 +0000

stan wareing is a walloper

By: stan wareing

stan wareing — Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:31:11 +0000

Typical arrogance – would you like to be run over ( or your wife or child ) by a 4×4 with bull(y) bars on ?

By: clive hammond

clive hammond — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 10:07:13 +0000

Sadly all Blake Ludwig gets across is the prejudice of the “anti” who despite all the evidence to the contrary – still try to maintain that 4×4′s are somehow child killers/planet killers etc etc.

How they manage to keep going in light of the evidence is amazing. I suggest we just humour them rather like we would if someone came running up to you in the street and said “The world is flat you know!”

By: chris hosking

chris hosking — Tue, 08 May 2007 19:58:21 +0000

i would rather get run over by a land rover than a lorry.i have an early freelander it is safer, more practical,more ecconomical & will go more places than the ford focus i had before.

By: Blake Ludwig

Blake Ludwig — Tue, 08 May 2007 11:50:16 +0000

While the Freelander has a great rating for passenger and child safety, it still has only a 1 start rating for pedestrian safety.
While the passenger safety is important, the majority of Land Rover models remain a dangerous fashion accessory on our roads when it comes to danger to cyclists and pedestrians.